Daisy-chained replications
This is a little old - I’m going through my bookmarks - but:
5 posts
This is a little old - I’m going through my bookmarks - but:
From Retraction Watch, a story about a retraction is really a story about Nature’s failure to publish a refutation:
I normally do not post about sexism, racism, and other forms of bigotry in the scientific community here. While I obviously think they exist and am against them, it is ambiguous how these “isms” impact/bias the scientific literature. (I am sure they do. But perhaps in a less concrete way than, say, the file-drawer phenomenon, or clear misuse of statistics.)
From the article:
If you want reproducible science, the software needs to be open source.